Larry Brown's

The Heaviside Plan ™

Electric Power

Introduction

In
Space Heat we outlined the development of Free Heat ™ units to heat individual rooms. Now we take up the matter of Electric Power. Part of our philosophy for using energy extracted from the active vacuum is that we should extract the energy in the form in which we desire to use it. So why can't we extract electric power from the active vacuum? The answer is that we can for it has been done most notably with the Motionless Electric Generator ( MEG) which is in limbo due to lack of funding. So, lacking that solution we propose using heat from the active vacuum with we did for the Free Heat ™ units in Space Heat and Transportation.

Another aspect of our philosophy is Point of Use (POU) which we demonstrated in Hot Water. So, for the instant case, Electric Power, we recommend producing the Electric Power when and where it is used. To implement this we need a family of different electric generators that use heat extracted from the active vacuum.

Development

The first design task is to determine the amount of electric power needed, the location of use, and the technique to convert heat energy into electric power. Ultimately, we will need units to provide electric power at power levels of

100 Watts 250 Watts 500 Watts
1 KW 2.5 KW 5 KW
10 KW 25 KW 50 KW
 
100 KW 1 MW 10 MW
100 MW 1 GW 10 GW

The smaller units, up to 5 KW will primarily be needed for portable/emergency power. A single family house requires 10 to 50 KW. Commercial buildings will require up to 1 MW. An industrial enterprise might require as much as 100 MW.

Frequently statements about alternative energy will say the unit is enough for thousands homes. When you seen these claims always divide the amount of power being produced by the number of homes the alternative energy source will supply. If the resulting power per home is less than 10,000 watts (10 KW), you'll know the story is not true. For example, a story may say that a 20 MW windmill turbine will supply enough electric power for 20,000 homes. Divide 20,000 KW (20 MW) by 20,000 and you get 1 KW--not enough to run a 1,500 watt electric bathroom heater. A heat pump may require 4 KW to run and more than 10 KW to get started.

Next, we need to consider what kind of prime mover we should use of different size generators in different locations. The possibilities include all the different engines discussed for Transportation plus thermophotoelectric generators. The other possibilities consist of an alternator driven one of the engines discussed in Transportation. The different engines all have different characteristics that will affect the suitability for different applications. For example, a very small gas turbine (micro-turbine) could be used for applications requiring power up to, say, 50 KW, but it will probably be unacceptably noisy for many applications (the speed of the compressor/turbine increases as the output power decreases). The a Stirling Engine is noted for high efficiency and quiet operation. Steam Engines are about the only choice for electric power levels above 100 MW; but they require quite a long time to bring up to operating power. Gas Turbines fill the gap for electric power capacities from about 50 KW to 50 MW.
Here is a chart showing the ranges of electric power output for the different engines:
  Thermophotoelectric --------|
  Stirling Engine ----------------------|
                     |- micro-turbine -|
                                             |--------- Gas Turbine -----------|
                                                                         |--------- Steam Turbine ---------|
  |------|----------|------------|------------|-------------|-------------|------------|--------------|
  0    100 W   1 KW     10 KW     100 KW     1 MW     10 MW     100 MW     1 GW
This chart is an approximation based present capabilities of the different engines. The development will probably proceed from low capacity units to larger units unless someone steps forward with a need for a larger unit earlier in the extended development cycle. If the idea of POU catches on for electric power generation, there will probably never be the need to convert or build any units larger than, say, 200 MW.

Economics

As mentioned on the pages for Space Heat and Transportation one of the features of the The Heaviside Plan ™ is that no Government aid will be required. This is, in our opinion, necessary to minimize government interference in the development and marketing of Free Heat ™ electric power generators or/and conversion kits for existing electric power generators. The pricing of the electric power generators can be based upon the cost of production of the equipment plus an additional amount proportional to the cost of the fuel the conventional generator would consume over a five-year period. The units can be sold as coming with a life-time supply of energy. Or, saying it another way we intend that the break-even point will be five years or less.

Summary

More choices and one size doesn't fit all; 1 GW central steam electric power generating plants, gas turbine powered electric power generators, thermophotoelectric generators. Each generator would be "fueled" by one or more Free Heat ™ unit(s) of appropriate size. Here we prefer the POU approach which would distribute the electric power generation to the individual building level. In 40 years we could eliminate the huge (1 GW) central (coal, petroleum, natural gas or nuclear fueled) electric power generating plants and the unsightly, terrorist target, weather impacted distribution lines.

Updated:  May 21, A.D. 2009

e-mail your comments